For my chosen video to analyze I have looked at Weezer’s
‘Buddy Holly’, released in 1994 under the labels DGC, Interscope and Epitaph. Weezer
are a modern rock band formed in 1992 and have released 9 studio albums. I have
chosen to look at ‘Buddy Holly’ because of its unique and interesting narrative
and integration of performance; additionally I personally like the band and
find their videos interesting and distinctive to their sound.
Goodwin in his novel ‘Dancing in the Distraction Factory’
highlights a range of different concepts and conventions that are repeatedly
used in music videos and other forms of mediation. Particularly, Goodwin looks
at the idea of contextualisation within music videos. In music promos, there
are often references to existing texts in order to spark of recognition in the
audience. Weezer’s music video for Buddy Holly, distinctly harnesses this idea.
The complete narrative is set in an episode of the 70’s show ‘Happy Days’ which
within itself is contextualised within an idyllic American idea of the mid 50’s
and 60’s. Weezer use a wide range of
techniques to keep with the context of time. Costume is keeping with the
fashion of the 50’s; instruments are also ‘old’ and reflective of what people
would play in that time. Additionally, little things such as dance moves,
ethnicity of the characters and the grain of the video matches the show
perfectly and at times the band (Weezer) are virtually undetectable as their
integration into some of the real ‘Happy Days’ clips used in the music video.
Buddy Holly was known as a pioneer of rock & roll music and it could be
argued that Weezer as a rock band owe some thanks to how he has developed the
music industry and helped shape rock & roll music in the mainstream. As
such it could be said that Weezer’s song ‘Buddy Holly’ is a tribute to his work
and also a distinct contextualisation of an iconic figure of the 50’s creating
a point of association for people who will remember Buddy Holly in life.
Goodwin also talks about the idea of looking. Weezer’s music
video again proves Goodwin correct in the use of voyeuristic tendencies within
music videos. ‘Buddy Holly’ is set as a
TV Show and as such means that you are the viewer watching through a
television. The director plays with that idea by opening the video with a
presenter talking to the camera as a TV host would do. By doing this the
director has played with the position of the audience and created a window
within a window. This is frequently seen amongst modern music videos where the
band/ performer becomes a lot more connected with the audience and commonly
looks into the camera, merging the line between narrative and performance.
Along with the notion of looking, the voyeuristic treatment of the female body
isn’t as prominent in this video. Women are featured in the video frequently
however, their position as character is never sexualised, I believe this is
because the narrative and context of the video is set in the 50’s where US
television was distinctively more conservative than it is now, and the
sexualisation of women, particularly young women was not seen as acceptable by
the majority. Nonetheless, clips of
original pretty female characters from ‘Happy Days’ are shown. This can be seen
as a considerably more docile version of the sexualisation of women, but
nonetheless it is in sighting the notion to look and the objectification of
women in the media.
In addition looking at the different relationships between
lyrics and music to the visuals is interesting and can be argued from different
angles. However, my perception of their relationships are that visuals in the
relation with lyrics amplify what is being sung, this is because the chorus
repeats ‘Oh ee oh, I look just like Buddy Holly’ the visuals clearly make a
connection to the lyrics by setting the video in the time Buddy Holly was an
iconic figure amongst celebrities. On the other hand, I believe the
relationship between the music style (style of the band) and the visuals are to
an extent disjuncture but could also be argued to be an accentuation to the
music style that they originated from (50’s rock & roll). I believe that
the style of the video is a disjuncture to that of the music style only because
of the sound of the music, it sounds heavy and in places uses synthesizers
which wouldn’t have been used (as far as I know) in mainstream 50’s music.
Moreover, the image that was assume is different to that that is being
presented; I assume to see styled down and ‘casual’ clothing, matching that of
the laid back and heavy tones in the sound of the music. Regardless, of my
perceptions on the relationship between the music and visuals, many different
arguments can be made and with each it’s on validity.
No comments:
Post a Comment